How Does the Ment Funding Evaluation Compare to Traditional Firms?
Traders often face a choice: pursue a prop firm evaluation like Ment Funding or apply to a traditional proprietary trading firm. While both offer funding opportunities, their evaluation processes, expectations, and long-term benefits vary significantly.
Speed of Evaluation
Ment Funding offers near-instant access to an evaluation account. Traders can begin within minutes after signup, and there are no interviews or employment contracts.
Traditional firms may require:
- Applications
- Interviews
- In-person trading assessments
- Educational background reviews
Advantage: Ment Funding
Cost to Join
Joining a traditional prop firm is often free, but may require unpaid training or capital contribution. Ment Funding charges an upfront fee, but offers immediate access and the ability to reset affordably if needed.
Advantage: Tied (depends on your budget and timeline)
Flexibility and Freedom
Ment Funding traders use their own strategy, on their own time. No office hours, no managers, no monthly quotas. Traditional firms often require desk time, daily reports, and sometimes specific strategy execution.
Advantage: Ment Funding
Scaling and Payouts
Traditional firms often offer higher scaling potential and more capital for elite performers. But Ment Funding allows fast scaling and pays out monthly (or more frequently, depending on rules).
Advantage: Depends on trader level
Performance Metrics
Ment Funding uses a clear set of rules:
- Profit target
- Trailing drawdown
- Daily loss
Traditional firms evaluate discretionary skills, risk appetite, and sometimes use vague KPIs.
Advantage: Ment Funding (for clarity)
Long-Term Career vs Short-Term Funding
If you’re seeking a long-term trading career with mentorship, a traditional prop desk might be better. But if you’re an independent trader wanting to get funded quickly, Ment Funding is more accessible.
Both have advantages—it depends on your career goals and how you want to trade.
Traders focused on autonomy, flexibility, and fast-track funding often prefer the evaluation model offered by Ment Funding. But those looking for structured teams and mentorship may still lean toward traditional firms.